Blog
FINRA Arbitration Filed Against Securities America
October 1, 2009
Aidikoff, Uhl & Bakhtiari (www.securitiesarbitration.com) announces the filing of a FINRA arbitration claim against Securities America on behalf of investors in Medical Capital securities. The law firm has been contacted by investors and is preparing to file additional FINRA arbitration claims against broker dealers for losses incurred based on the recommendation to purchase Medical Capital […]
Read More
Provident Royalties — SEC OBTAINS ASSET FREEZE IN $485 MILLION NATIONWIDE OFFERING FRAUD
July 5, 2009
On July 2, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a temporary restraining order and emergency asset freeze in a $485 million offering fraud and Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Paul R. Melbye, Brendan W. Coughlin and Henry D. Harrison through a company they owned and controlled, Provident Royalties LLC. In addition to the asset freeze, […]
Read More
FINRA Settles ARS Complaint With Four Firms
May 8, 2009
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has entered into final settlements with four additional firms to settle charges relating to the sale of Auction Rate Securities (ARS) that became illiquid when auctions froze in February 2008. To date, FINRA has concluded final settlements with nine firms, imposing a total of $2.6 […]
Read More
FINRA to Launch Pilot Program to Evaluate All-Public Arbitration Panels
July 24, 2008
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) will launch a two-year pilot program later this fall that will allow some investors making arbitration claims to choose a panel made up of three public arbitrators instead of two public arbitrators and one non-public arbitrator, as is currently the norm. Six firms – Merrill Lynch, Citigroup Global Markets, […]
Read More
FINRA Board Approves Rule to Limit Motions to Dismiss in Arbitrations
September 26, 2007
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that its Board of Governors approved rule amendments designed to limit significantly the number of dispositive motions – more commonly known as motions to dismiss — filed in its arbitration forum and to impose strict sanctions against parties who engage in abusive motions practices. “In many instances […]
Read More